The Spears of Laconia (Purge of Babylon, #7)
Review:Even crack cocaine gets boring after you have had enough. 
Review:Even crack cocaine gets boring after you have had enough. 
Review:Gack, I want the last one! I never noticed it was not out yet! Ok, preordered :P 
Last night, Juanjo Conti tweeted this:
Usando exactamente una vez los dígitos 1, 3, 4 y 6 y cualquiera de las cuatro operaciones básicas, obtener 24.
— Juanjo Conti (@jjconti) octubre 27, 2015
Or, in english: "Using exactly once the digits 1,3,4 and 6, and any of the four basic operations, obtain 24."
I first spent a couple of minutes thinking about it and then it hit me: there is no point in thinking this sort of problem, because:
Brute forcing it will take less time
What you do while "thinking" it is sort of lame, isn't it?
So, here is a moreorless general solution for any of these problems.
from __future__ import print_function, division import itertools numbers = ['1','3','4','6'] target = 24 # Having '' as an operation allows for solution (146)*3, which # may or may not be valid depending on rule interpretation. operations = ['*','/','+','',''] t1='(({0}{4}{1}){5}{2}){6}{3}' t2='{0}{4}({1}{5}({2}{6}{3}))' for nums in itertools.permutations(numbers): for ops1 in itertools.combinations_with_replacement(operations, 3): for ops2 in itertools.permutations(ops1): for t in (t1, t2): s = t.format(*(nums+ops2)) #print(repr(s)) try: if eval(s) == target: print(s) except (ZeroDivisionError, SyntaxError, TypeError): continue
Of course you can make it solve any problem of this class by adjusting numbers and target.
There is also a possible extra solution if eval(s) == target
where you just need to add
a unary  to the expression, but who cares.
Did I miss something? Is this really a general solution?

